Taskforce on Ogiek resettlement illegal, court rules
Rift Valley
By
Daniel Chege
| Oct 02, 2024
The taskforce created to implement the ruling of African Court on Human People's Rights (ACHPR) regarding the resettlement of over 35,000 Ogiek communities is illegal, null and void.
Environment and Lands Court Judge John Mutungi ruled that the taskforce, formed by the government in November 2017, did not include Ogiek members, which was unfair and unjust.
Justice Mutungi, in his verdict delivered on Monday, said the Ogiek community have a right of access to information on their resettlement in the Mau complex.
"The rights of the Ogiek community were violated as ruled by the African Court in Arusha on May 26, 2017," Mutungi said.
READ MORE
Inside Kenya's battle to wrap up China trade pact
Why dignity should be at the heart of Kenya's digital lending
Gulf Energy secures oil rig ahead of Lokichar project kick-off
Big win for Ruto as court clears path for sale of key State firms
PwC now seeks buyers for Koko Networks assets
Kenya Pipeline Company IPO extended by three working days
When fundamentals are stable but the patient is terrified
CMA extends Kenya Pipeline Company IPO deadline to February 24
Why services sector offers best bet for jobs, economic development
Beyond the cloud: How US firm has built muscle in the digital world
He noted that the African court set a timeline of 12 months for the resettlement and compensation, but evidence in court shows the same has not been done.
"When the multi-agency taskforce was set up, it denied the Ogiek access to information on the resettlement plan by illegally excluding the community in its decision," observed Mutungi.
The judge ruled that the establishment of the taskforce without a gazette notice or involvement of the community was a nullity, illegal and unlawful.
The same taskforce, the court noted, not only secluded the Ogiek community in the membership but also failed to consult the community on its implementation process.
He directed the community to now focus on the enforcement of the 2017 judgement, noting that the court in Kenya had no jurisdiction to enforce the orders and cannot interfere with its ruling.
The taskforce comprised officials from the Office of the President, ministries of Environment, Land and Sports, National Treasury, the Attorney General, Kenya National Human Rights Commission, National Lands Commission and Kenya Forest Service.