Charge five was supported by 49 with 16 voting no. Two abstained. The charge involved breaching his oath of office.
Forty-eight senators voted to uphold charge six, with 18 voting against the accusations of breaching the National Cohesion and Integration Act. One abstained.
Gachagua was condemned on the ninth charge by 46 senators, with 20 voting to save him. One abstained from the vote that involved attacking the National Intelligence Service.
The second charge was endorsed by 28 senators, with 39 voting against it. The third charge was defeated by 45 senators, with 19 endorsing it. Three senators abstained on the third matter.
The seventh charge, relating to money laundering allegations, was defeated by 53 senators. Thirteen found that the charge had been substantiated with one senator abstaining. Charge eight on contravening the Penal Code was equally defeated, 40 against 27.
The 10th charge on insubordination was defeated 45 to 22. The 11th, bullying, was defeated 47 to 18, with two senators abstaining. It was unclear how those who cast their votes manually voted.
The former DP was unlikely to survive the extremely partisan vote. President William Ruto and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga's allies teamed up to remove Gachagua from office.
Futile attempt
Gachagua got most of his support from senators from his Mt Kenya backyard and those from former Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka's Wiper Party, which opposed Gachagua's removal from office.
Gachagua, earlier taken ill, was not in the Senate chamber to witness his political career was ended. His removal from office by impeachment means he cannot hold political office in future.
The former DP did not give his testimony as he had requested, leaving senators to weigh the prosecution's testimony, led by Mutuse and two other witnesses.
Ben Mulwa, a former acting chief executive of the Kenya Medical Supplies Authority, presented evidence of being bullied by the former DP. Abdi Mohamud, the deputy CEO of the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission, attempted to tie Gachagua to corruption allegations.
Defence lawyers had attempted to show that the prosecution had failed to provide evidence to support their case. The National Assembly argued that they did not need to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt as impeachment was a political process.