Judge rejects maintenance plea from woman in divorce case
Rift Valley
By
Julius Chepkwony
| Nov 14, 2023
A court has denied a woman's request for maintenance from her ex-husband.
Eldoret High Court Judge Reuben Nyakundi, in a judgment last week, said that when spouses have no children who depend on them, there is no advantage for either party.
The judge declared that the traditional view of men as sole breadwinners and responsible for their spouses' support is outdated.
"The issues that the union was blessed with are all adults, with the youngest being 26 years of age, and therefore, there are no children requiring the support of the parents. I have considered the submissions of the petitioner on alimony and find no grounds to grant the prayer for alimony or maintenance,” the judge ruled.
According to the woman's petition, the couple married on August 9, 1975, under the African Marriage and Divorce Act at Cheptiret Catholic Mission in Nandi County.
READ MORE
Madagascar tycoon to buy Zuku parent firm Wananchi Group
Real estate posts high productivity as challenges hit wholesale, retail sectors
Gold rush: How illegal gallbladder trade threatens Lake Victoria fishers
How container cash deposits are creating a problem for Kenyan traders
Agencies in fresh plan to market Kenyan coffee
AI-driven smart borders transform travel security
Fresh test for Ruto as IMF urges new tax policies to unlock loans
Kenya's nuclear power plan faces significant cost hurdles
Healthcare and business: Diana Okello's journey in aviation medicine niche
How access to credit is boosting tech adoption, earnings for SMEs
The woman later sought an end to the union on the grounds of adultery, cruelty, and desertion. She requested the court to dissolve the marriage, divide the property, and grant alimony and maintenance.
During the hearing, the woman said that her ex-husband, a former police officer, introduced other women into their marriage in 2009 and 2012. She accused him of having a bad temper and being arrogant, contemptuous and abusive.
She also testified that he left their home in 2006 to live with other women. According to her, their differences were irreconcilable, and the marriage had broken down irretrievably.
The man contested the petition, denying the adultery claims and arguing that the evidence was hearsay.
His lawyer contended that he never deserted their home in 2006; instead, the woman left when he was sick and bedridden.
The judge, after reviewing both parties' submissions, concluded that they could not maintain a loving relationship.
"What emerges from the proceedings is that the petitioner does not want to be in the union with the respondent as she believes he is an adulterous man and that he has been cruel to her over the years. I agree with the petitioner that trying to resuscitate this union would be akin to flogging a dead horse. In the premises, it is my view that the marriage has irretrievably broken down,” the judge ruled.
The court refused to order property division, stating that such requests should be made through a High Court application after obtaining a 'decree absolute' confirming the divorce.
jchepkwony@standardmedia.co.ke
- Ford Kenya won't fold, to remain in ruling alliance, party leaders say
- Raila: I'm quitting active politics to focus on AUC chair campaigns
- Dr Austin Omondi has been found, KMPDU reports
- Gen Z use church pulpits to send anti-Finance Bill messages
- Eliud Mathu property fights: Curse of Kenya's founding fathers