Friday D-Day for Nakuru dog dispute
Rift Valley
By
Yvonne Chepkwony
| Aug 23, 2022
A Nakuru Court will Friday rule on who is the real owner of a pet dog known as Prince.
Prince has been at the centre of an ownership row between two neighbours.
On Monday Nakuru Resident Magistrate Dominic Macharia told one of the protagonists, Dorris Moraa, who was yet to file her submission, to do so before the end of the day after Julius Nyabando filed his.
Nyabando filed a suit against Ms Moraa on January 17, 2022, averring that she had borrowed his German Shepherd sire dog in July 2020 and promised to return it after impregnating her dam.
In his submissions, Nyabando informed the court that he sought an order directing Moraa to release Prince or alternatively pay for the pet. He stated that Moraa had wrongfully detained his dog and was dealing with Prince in a manner inconsistent with his possession rights.
READ MORE
Taxman softens stance in bid to woo MSMEs into tax net
Impact of money laundering and terrorism financing on African economies
Vimal Shah: Trust is crucial for growing your startup
Traders upbeat about Israel's new canal project to lower import costs
Stop lying about county disbursements, governors tell Mbadi
Use the proposed taxation Bill to ease high cost of living, MPs told
Falling inflation: Market correction or a shrinking economy?
Eyes on KRA as multinationals fail tax transparency test
"The thrust of this suit is whether Moraa wrongfully detained Nyabando's dog," read the submission.
Doctor witness
The court document indicated that there was no contention regarding the ownership of the Prince pointing out that the doctor who delivered Prince and another witness who assisted with the delivery of the dog on April 15, 2019, had testified in support of Nyabando.
"It is not in contention that the Nyabando lawfully owned the dog, as established during the examination, a fact that was collaborated by two other witnesses who did state that on April 15, 2019, Nyabando called Dr Omanga to assist in the delivery of the dog," read Nyabando's submissions.
Nyabando observed that the witnesses called by Moraa had agreed that the dog belonged to him, but she started living with it in July 2020.
"He maintained that the duo entered into an oral agreement that the woman would return the dog after siring and would ensure a safe return. She, however, didn't produce in court any document or proof to support her assertion that the dog was given to her as appreciation for the building material and payment of workers," he said.