Petition filed to block State's Sh204b Safaricom shares sale to Vodacom
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Jan 28, 2026
Two activists have moved to court seeking to halt the government’s planned sale of a 15 per cent stake in Safaricom to Vodacom Group, arguing the Sh204.3 billion transaction is undervalued and secret.
Tony Gachoka, a veteran journalist and KANU spokesman, and economics professor Fredrick Ogola have filed a constitutional petition at the Milimani High Court challenging what they term an illegal sale that threatens national sovereignty and security.
They claim the government is selling 6,009,814,200 shares at Sh34 per share when the estimated fair value ranges between Sh70 and Sh80 per share, potentially exposing Kenya to losses of over Sh250 billion.
“The said price is grossly undervalued and appears to have been poorly and selectively negotiated by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Respondents, to the grave detriment of the Kenyan public, given the prevailing and intrinsic market value of the shares,” petition states.
READ MORE
Ruto's Sh906b local borrowing plan threatens private credit
Why pension funds still bet big on State bonds
Africa's $100 trillion opportunity hides in its broken systems
How single-window policy locks exporters out of global trade
Agronomists reel from double trouble of high taxes, multiple licences
Firm to lead rollout of Chinese EV brand across Africa
From pocket to wrist: OPPO banks on Reno15 series and watch S to increase sales
Sh1.9b shame: How poor planning, oversight gaps sank the Likoni floating bridge
More holes in payslip as new NSSF rates set to come into force
KPC stake sale: Kenya's strategic play in East Africa's oil and gas rush
They have sued the Cabinet Secretaries for National Treasury and Information Communication, alongside the Communications Authority, Competition Authority, the Attorney General, Safaricom PLC, and Vodacom Group as respondents.
According to the petition, Safaricom has consistently been one of Kenya’s highest revenue-generating entities, contributing approximately Sh18–20 billion annually.
Gachoka argues that the transaction appears to have been poorly and selectively negotiated to the grave detriment of Kenyan public, and conducted without transparency, public participation, or independent valuation.