Petition filed to block State's Sh204b Safaricom shares sale to Vodacom
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Jan 28, 2026
Two activists have moved to court seeking to halt the government’s planned sale of a 15 per cent stake in Safaricom to Vodacom Group, arguing the Sh204.3 billion transaction is undervalued and secret.
Tony Gachoka, a veteran journalist and KANU spokesman, and economics professor Fredrick Ogola have filed a constitutional petition at the Milimani High Court challenging what they term an illegal sale that threatens national sovereignty and security.
They claim the government is selling 6,009,814,200 shares at Sh34 per share when the estimated fair value ranges between Sh70 and Sh80 per share, potentially exposing Kenya to losses of over Sh250 billion.
“The said price is grossly undervalued and appears to have been poorly and selectively negotiated by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Respondents, to the grave detriment of the Kenyan public, given the prevailing and intrinsic market value of the shares,” petition states.
READ MORE
Equity Q1 net profit up 24pc to Sh18.3b on regional units
KCB Q1 net earnings hit Sh17.8b to join rivals in defying tough times
Centum Re begins handover of 400 apartments at Nairobi's Two Rivers
Epra makes marginal hike on pipeline tariff, piles pressure on consumers
ICPAK urges accountants to restore trust in public institutions
Alarm raised over lagging decarbonisation in construction industry
Retail investors can now own a piece of mega infrastructure projects through NSE
Why AI is gaining prominence in Africa's new investment agenda
New push to formalise garbage collection SMEs
The power of patience, psychology and strategy in debt recovery
They have sued the Cabinet Secretaries for National Treasury and Information Communication, alongside the Communications Authority, Competition Authority, the Attorney General, Safaricom PLC, and Vodacom Group as respondents.
According to the petition, Safaricom has consistently been one of Kenya’s highest revenue-generating entities, contributing approximately Sh18–20 billion annually.
Gachoka argues that the transaction appears to have been poorly and selectively negotiated to the grave detriment of Kenyan public, and conducted without transparency, public participation, or independent valuation.