Petition filed against cybercrime law amendments
National
By
Kamau Muthoni
| Sep 02, 2025
A battle has emerged over Parliament's move to amend the Cybercrime law in a bid to seal gaps in dealing with cults and extreme religious activities.
In a case filed before the High Court in Nairobi, lawyer Evance Ndong argued that the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime (Amendment) Bill, 2024, is vague and grants the government blanket authority to act against any religious organisation.
According to him, the law does not clarify what constitutes extreme religious activities or what defines a cult.
"The phrase 'extreme religious and cultic practices' is impermissibly vague and overbroad, lacking any constitutional or statutory definition. This offends the principle of legal certainty and undermines the right to a fair hearing under Article 50 of the Constitution," argued Ndong.
He stated that the government was using the Shakahola saga to suppress the right to worship and belief.
READ MORE
Dangote favours Mombasa over Tanzania's Tanga for Sh2tr oil refinery
Pipeline politics: Why East Africa's joint refinery dream faces slippery path
Debt burden: Inside Treasury's plan to trap Kenya with billions in hidden debt
State plans major audit shakeup to stem graft, wastage of funds
Creative economy key to job creation, says PS Fikirini Jacobs
Beyond the Silicon Savannah: Why Africa's AI revolution must start 'mashinani'
Airtel takes on Safaricom with Sh5.6b data centre
Lokichar-Lamu crude pipeline plan still on, says Treasury
Employers warn of rising costs, urge Ruto to protect jobs
British Airways parent says Mideast war to hit annual profits
He further argued that the law encroaches upon powers already vested in the police to investigate such crimes and the Director of Public Prosecutions to determine whether or not to charge a person.
"Respondents, in purporting to pass the Bill, have failed to adhere to the mandatory standards of Article 24, which strictly require that any limitation of rights be reasonable, justifiable, and proportionate in an open and democratic society," he argued.
In the case before Justice Lawrence Mugambi, the lawyer noted that Parliament inserted Clause 3, which empowers the National Computer and Cybercrimes Coordination Committee to block websites and applications deemed to promote illegal activities, child pornography, terrorism, and extreme religious and cultic practices.
He sued the Attorney General, the National Assembly, and the Senate, claiming that despite the amendments having grave implications for believers, they had not been subjected to public participation.
According to him, both the Senate committee and other state task forces had recommended a structured regulation of religious organisations.
Ndong noted that, instead of pursuing those recommendations openly, the government clandestinely introduced the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime (Amendment) Bill, 2024, by publishing Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 156 of 9 August 2024.
He added that the Bill was sponsored by Wajir East MP, Aden Daudi Mohamed.
"Article 32 of the Constitution expressly secures the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, and opinion, including the right not to be compelled to act contrary to one's faith. By vesting unrestrained censorship discretion in an executive committee, the Bill threatens this fundamental guarantee," argued Ndong.