Relief for TSC boss as High Court throws out corruption petition
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Oct 18, 2024
It is a major win for the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) CEO Nancy Macharia, after the High Court dismissed a petition seeking her removal from office over corruption allegations.
In a judgment delivered by Justice Lawrence Mugambi, the court found that the petition filed by activist Francis Owino, which accused Macharia of violating Chapter Six of the Constitution through gross misappropriation and misuse of public funds amounting to over Sh3 billion for salaries, was premature.
While striking out the petition, the judge ruled in favour of Macharia, citing a lack of sufficient evidence to support the allegations against the TSC boss necessary for the court to determine that she is unfit to hold public office.
“In my firm view, there is absolutely no iota of probative evidence to sustain the allegations against TSC chief executive for the court to make a declaration for her removal,” Justice Mugambi said.
READ MORE
Local businesses urged to embrace sustainable practices
Behind-the-scenes rush as clock ticks for sale of Bamburi Cement
Pension industry seeks to flex its muscle in large State projects
Why construction sector is on steady decline in Kenya
Why affordable communication is key to AfCFTA
Treasury goes for UAE loan as IMF cautions of debt situation
Traders claim closure of liquor stores, bars near schools punitive
Adani fallout is a lesson on accountability and transparency fight
Sustainable finance in focus for Kenyan banks as Co-op Bank feted
The allegations in the petition detailed several issues purportedly plaguing TSC under Macharia’s leadership.
Owino stated in his petition that the Auditor General had implicated the TSC in a Sh3 billion salary scandal, where the chief executive allegedly overpaid a section of the staff despite the agency facing a shortage of teachers.
The petitioner also accused the commission of failing to remit over Sh2 billion in taxes deducted from staff salaries and noted that some employees who had not repaid their salary advances continued to draw more advances, raising questions about possible collusion to misuse the commission’s funds.
Furthermore, Awino pointed out that the Auditor General’s report indicated that a review of the payroll for the 2020/2021 financial year revealed that 32 teachers had an outstanding balance of salary overpayment amounting to Sh33,780,614.
The repayment period for these amounts extends beyond the retirement age of the respective teachers, casting doubt on the recoverability of the balance.
The Auditor General’s report indicated that some teachers had substantial outstanding balances from overpayments, casting doubt on the recoverability of these funds. One particular case involved a teacher overpaid by Sh4.8 million, with a repayment scheme that would take an impractical 44 years to recover.
The petition alleged that Macharia’s actions had led to gross misconduct and corruption within TSC, seeking declarations that she had violated constitutional provisions and should be held accountable.
The petitioner called for a mandamus order compelling the EACC to investigate Macharia and, if warranted, for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to initiate criminal proceedings against her.
But in his decision, the judge noted that any inquiries regarding violations of leadership should have been raised with the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) before approaching the court.
The court reiterated that the responsibility to enforce Chapter Six of the Constitution primarily lies with the EACC.
Judge Mugambi also noted that the claims made by Owino were based on an auditor’s report and lacked subsequent investigations to corroborate the findings.
“The Auditor’s report, however, has not been subjected to any further investigations to corroborate the assumptions made. Aside from the general conclusions, there are no authenticated annexures or witness testimonies to support the claims. In the eyes of the court, these are hearsay statements and do not prove the case against Macharia,” Mugambi said.
“For a proper assessment, an investigation should have commenced to gather evidence supporting the allegations,” the judge held.