SHIF's ability to cater to the specific needs of individuals with disabilities is uncertain
Health Opinion
By
Ashura Michael
| Apr 08, 2024
In Kenya, access to quality and affordable healthcare remains a significant challenge, particularly for persons with disabilities. The introduction of the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF) presents a potential solution, but its effectiveness in addressing the healthcare needs of individuals with disabilities is debated.
Persons with disabilities encounter various obstacles in accessing healthcare, including physical barriers and financial constraints, leading to poorer health outcomes. SHIF aims to address these challenges by pooling resources for equitable healthcare distribution. However, its ability to cater to the specific needs of individuals with disabilities is uncertain.
To maximise SHIF’s support for persons with disabilities, several key measures are essential. Firstly, inclusive policy formulation is crucial, involving representatives from the disability community to ensure their unique challenges are considered. This includes addressing the healthcare needs of neurodiverse individuals and ensuring medication coverage and affordability.
READ MORE
Tribunal orders Stanbic Bank to pay KRA Sh234m in tax claim
Top banks build Sh230b war chest for bad loans amid economic gloom
Kendu Bay: Sleepy fishing town that no lender will bank on
Why Kenya's export strategy needs more effort to grow markets
Local businesses urged to embrace sustainable practices
Behind-the-scenes rush as clock ticks for sale of Bamburi Cement
Pension industry seeks to flex its muscle in large State projects
Why construction sector is on steady decline in Kenya
Why affordable communication is key to AfCFTA
Treasury goes for UAE loan as IMF cautions of debt situation
Secondly, prioritising accessibility is vital, requiring SHIF to allocate resources for infrastructure adjustments and assistive technologies in healthcare facilities. Thirdly, healthcare services must be tailored to diverse needs, including specialized equipment, sign language interpretation, and competent healthcare professionals.
Financial support through subsidies or exemptions is necessary to alleviate economic burdens associated with healthcare expenses for individuals with disabilities. Public awareness initiatives are also needed to combat stigma and promote inclusivity.
Continuous monitoring and evaluation of SHIF’s impact on individuals with disabilities enable responsive adjustments and improvements based on real-time feedback. Coverage of essential medicines and treatments tailored to the needs of individuals with neurodiversity should be included within SHIF.
While SHIF offers promise in addressing healthcare disparities, proactive measures are required to ensure inclusivity and accessibility for persons with disabilities. It should be seen as a vehicle for social justice and equality in healthcare, rather than a burden.
In conclusion, achieving equitable healthcare access for persons with disabilities in Kenya demands collaborative efforts. By harnessing SHIF’s potential and implementing targeted interventions, a healthcare system that leaves no one behind can be realised. It’s time to bridge the gap and uphold healthcare as a fundamental right for all, regardless of ability.
Ashura Michael, Public Policy and Social Justice Advocate