An employee cannot resign to escape disciplinary action, appellate court rules
business
By
Julius Chepkwony
| Oct 27, 2025
The Court of Appeal has ruled that an employee cannot avoid disciplinary action by resigning or purporting to retire after being accused of misconduct.
A three-judge bench comprising Mohamed Warsame, John Mativo, and Gachoka Mwaniki upheld a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) in Nakuru, which found that former Timsales Limited employee Peter Chege could not use retirement to evade disciplinary proceedings.
"We affirm the trial court's finding that the appellant's purported retirement notice cannot be used to escape lawful disciplinary proceedings," the judges ruled.
They added that Chege's retirement without notice was invalid, as the disciplinary process had already commenced.
READ MORE
Dangote favours Mombasa over Tanzania's Tanga for Sh2tr oil refinery
Pipeline politics: Why East Africa's joint refinery dream faces slippery path
Debt burden: Inside Treasury's plan to trap Kenya with billions in hidden debt
State plans major audit shakeup to stem graft, wastage of funds
Creative economy key to job creation, says PS Fikirini Jacobs
Beyond the Silicon Savannah: Why Africa's AI revolution must start 'mashinani'
Airtel takes on Safaricom with Sh5.6b data centre
Lokichar-Lamu crude pipeline plan still on, says Treasury
Employers warn of rising costs, urge Ruto to protect jobs
British Airways parent says Mideast war to hit annual profits
Chege had appealed a 2020 ELRC decision dismissing his claim that his retirement rendered the proceedings null. The case arose after Timsales employees staged an unprotected strike in July 2018, prompting the company to issue show-cause letters. Chege, accused of absenteeism and damaging property, sought to retire in June 2019.
The court dismissed Chege's claims for benefits and damages, ruling he had "authored his own termination," and upheld the ELRC's judgment with costs.