Ousted Majority Leader granted reprieve in court
Coast
By
Joackim Bwana
| Jan 14, 2026
The High Court in Mombasa has temporarily stopped the removal of Athman Mwamwiri as Leader of Majority in the Mombasa County Assembly.
Justice Jairus Ngaah declined to set aside his orders in an application filed by Mombasa County Assembly Speaker Aharub Khatri seeking Mwamwiri’s ouster.
Khatri argued that Mwamwiri obtained conservatory orders through non-disclosure of material facts and that he misled the court that the decision to remove him was made by the assembly.
The Speaker said the vote was not done by the Assembly but by members of the ODM, the Majority party, in their meeting held on July 3, 2025.
READ MORE
Why local BPO sector stands out among its regional peers
IMF boss warns global system not ready for AI cyber threats
State threatens to revoke licenses of 13,000 Saccos over non-compliance
Kenya tightens grip on crypto with Sh500m capital rule
New law aims to protect internal auditors, strengthen public oversight
Ruto launches Sh5.5 billion plan to revamp Voi-Taveta metre gauge railway
Why underwriting is shifting as risk grows more complex
World Bank approves Sh71 billion for Isiolo-Mandera road construction
Banks double lending target to small businesses to hit Sh326b
Contradictions in rural economies 13 years into devolved governance
He also denied the assertion by Mwamwiri that the Assembly and the Speaker participated in the decision or process of his removal from office.
Khatri said that the dispute between Mwamwiri and his party ought to have been resolved under the Political Parties Act cap. 7D and, therefore, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
But Mwamwiri said that at no point, since his election in 2022, did the ODM party members of the County Assembly of Mombasa hold a meeting to discuss changes in the Assembly leadership.
“I was surprised to learn through the Assembly Order paper of August 5, 2025, and the communication from the Speaker, to the effect that there was a change of leadership of the Majority Party in the County Assembly and that Priscilla Mumba was now the majority party leader,” said Mwamwiri.
In his application, Mwamwiri asked the court to make a declaration that his purported removal was unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void ab initio.
He said the removal was not compliant with the Constitution, the County Governments Act, the Standing Orders of the Mombasa County Assembly, the Political Parties Act, and the Constitution of ODM party.
He said that his removal without approval from ODM, a valid resolution of the majority members of the County Assembly and without affording him an opportunity to be heard, violated Articles 27, 35, 47, 48, 50 and 236 of the Constitution.
Mwamwiri said failure to provide him with the requested documents forming the basis of his purported removal contravened his constitutional right of access to information under Article 35 of the Constitution and further violated the principles of transparency, accountability and fair administrative action.
He applied for the quashing, setting aside the resolution of the Mombasa County Assembly dated August 5, 2025, together with all consequential actions purporting to remove him from the position of Leader of the Majority Party.
Mwamwiri asked the court to compel Khatri to reinstate him as the duly recognised Leader of Majority with full rights, privileges and benefits. He also sought to stop the Assembly and the Speaker from installing Mumba as the Leader of Majority.
He also filed an application seeking conservatory orders restraining the County Assembly and Speaker from interfering with his duties as the Leader of Majority, pending the hearing and determination of this application.
“For the foregoing reasons, I am not persuaded that I need not have granted the conservatory order of September 1, 2025. I reject the 1st respondent’s (Khatri) application of September 8, 2025, and, for the avoidance of doubt, the order made on September 1, 2025, shall remain in force pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion for conservatory orders,” said Justice Ngaah.