Mumias sugarcane farmers protest at the Ekero area where were urging an investor who was in plans to revive Mumias sugar factory to continue with the plans but involve them as stakeholders.[Benjamin Sakwa, Standard]
With the ongoing tussle over the leasing of assets of Mumias Sugar Company, the sugar industry is in the news again. Which begs the question, what is the matter with the sugar sector? The simple answer is politics.
Given the amount of sugar we consume every day, how come these companies cannot make profits sustainably? Few sectors of the Kenyan economy have as many cartels as the sugar industry. Both public and private sugar companies have historically struggled to make profits, while also ensuring farmers get a fair share.
Furthermore, because of the nature of the product (every household consumes sugar), politicians have often found reason to intervene through subsidies or unscrupulous importation deals – with disastrous consequences.
Due to gross mismanagement, Kenyan sugar often cannot compete against imports. It is easy to forget that the sugar industry is one of the oldest in the country. The first two mills were established in Miwani, Kisumu County and Ramisi, Kwale County in 1922 and 1927, respectively.
READ MORE
Kisumu partners with Dutch organization on Sh4.9 billion project to end Nyando flooding
Sugar millers suffer due to cane poaching
Kisumu to be positioned as alternative beach and watersports destination in Kenya
These two firms owned their sugar plantations before 1954, when Kenyans were not allowed to grow cash crops. The colonial-era restrictions and the high demand for sugar set the stage for post-independence government intervention in the sector.
Muhoroni Sugar Company and Chemelil Sugar Company Limited were created in the mid-1960s. Then came Mumias, Nzoia and SONY.
Interestingly, in all five cases, the government opted to hire foreign firms to run the State-owned sugar firms. Beyond management, the government directly controlled the distribution of sugar through the Kenya National Trading Company.
Once politicians tasted rents in the sector, they have never looked back. They have appointed cronies to loot sugar companies. They have sabotaged the same companies whenever well-connected individuals wanted to illegally import sugar.
Meanwhile, farmers and dependent sectors have suffered. Facing perennial political risks, it is perhaps time for cane farmers to signal credible threats of permanent exit from the sector. May be then politicians will listen.
