- IEBC did not tally and verify the count before declaring the winner
- IEBC was dysfunctional and disunited and failed to deliver elections as an independent, transparent and impartial body as required in law
- The results of constituencies which they claim IEBC did not tally and verify before the final declaration affected the final outcome.
- The IEBC declaration did not follow the law and is therefore unconstitutional, invalid, null and void.
- Ruto did not meet and/or attain the constitutional threshold of 50 per cent plus 1 of the votes cast
- There were elaborate and fraudulent premeditated schemes to interfere with and undermine and defeat the integrity, credibility and security of the presidential election
- There was deliberate interference with the integrity, credibility and security of the presidential election with direct knowledge and participation of Chebukati.
- There was deliberate interference with the presidential elections and this altered the outcome.
- Chebukati fraudulently manipulated and distorted presidential election results to declare an inaccurate and invalid outcome.
- The irregularities and errors in the presidential elections were not minor or administrative or occasioned by human imperfection.
- Chebukati was a rogue chairperson and conducted a presidential election with premeditated intent and objectives of subverting and undermining the integrity of the electoral process.
- Some of the Forms 34A that were transmitted into the IEBC portal are different, in substance and form, from the physical copies issued to Raila's agents
- IEBC system was corruptly manipulated to the extent that the result on forms 34As is incomplete and provides an inaccurate number of total votes cast
- IEBC system was not secure and third parties gained access and manipulated the results.
- There was systemic voter suppression and ballot stuffing in Raila's strongholds.
What Raila Odinga will have to prove to the Supreme Court judges
By Patrick Alushula
| Aug. 23, 2022
