Zimbabwe's High Court on Thursday backed Chief Justice Luke Malaba's right to resume work despite a previous ruling that the president's decision to extend Malaba's tenure breached the constitution because he has turned 70.
The Malaba case has become the focus of a tussle between the High Court and President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who introduced a constitutional amendment that raised the retirement of Constitutional and Supreme Court judges to 75 from 70.
Lawyers have challenged the amendment but Malaba has resumed his work, prompting one of the lawyers to file contempt of court charges against the chief justice.
However, three High Court judges rejected the contempt of court charges on Thursday without immediately giving a reason for their verdict.
READ MORE
High Court strikes out rules giving CA powers on television content
KAA board did not approve Adani deal, aviation workers tell court
Martha Koome: I wish Supreme Court had 11 judges
Puzzle of missing CCTV footage at DCI in lawyer's murder case
The High Court ruled last month that Mnangagwa's decision to extend Malaba's tenure by five years was invalid. read more The government has appealed that verdict and the Supreme Court is yet to set a date for a hearing.
Critics accuse Mnangagwa of seeking to influence the judiciary, a charge he denies.