Gachagua impeachment: DCJ Mwilu can empanel a bench, court rules
National
By
Stephanie Wangari
| Oct 23, 2024
The High Court has ruled that Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu acted within her authority when she empaneled a three-judge bench to hear cases challenging the impeachment of Rigathi Gachagua.
In a decision delivered on Wednesday, Justices Eric Ogola, Antony Mrima, and Dr. Freda Mugambi found that Mwilu had properly exercised her administrative powers in forming the bench.
The ruling came after Gachagua's lawyers questioned the legality of the bench's formation.
"Under Article 165(4) of the Constitution, the Deputy Chief Justice is authorised to assign judges when discharging constitutional duties on behalf of the Chief Justice. In this case, we find no fault in the DCJ's decision, particularly since the Chief Justice [Martha Koome] raised no objections," Justice Mrima stated.
READ MORE
Why local BPO sector stands out among its regional peers
IMF boss warns global system not ready for AI cyber threats
State threatens to revoke licenses of 13,000 Saccos over non-compliance
Kenya tightens grip on crypto with Sh500m capital rule
New law aims to protect internal auditors, strengthen public oversight
Ruto launches Sh5.5 billion plan to revamp Voi-Taveta metre gauge railway
Why underwriting is shifting as risk grows more complex
World Bank approves Sh71 billion for Isiolo-Mandera road construction
Banks double lending target to small businesses to hit Sh326b
Contradictions in rural economies 13 years into devolved governance
On Tuesday, Gachagua's legal team argued that Article 165 grants the power to appoint a bench solely to the Chief Justice, a responsibility they said could not be delegated to the Deputy Chief Justice.
Lawyer Kibe Mungai accused the court of bias and raised concerns over the process Mwilu followed.
"The Deputy Chief Justice lacks the authority to empanel a bench. This is unconstitutional. Additionally, on what grounds was an executive application heard on a Saturday? That is a substantive issue," Mungai argued.
The objection was raised before the official hearing.
Gachagua is currently facing two legal battles: one challenging his impeachment and another contesting the swearing-in of his replacement.