Surveyor blames military for failing to do due diligence on disputed land

A senior land official has blamed the Kenya Army for failing to conduct due diligence before taking possession of a disputed 250-acre parcel of land in Gilgil.

Rift Valley Regional Surveyor Peter Wanyama, while testifying before Naivasha Environment and Lands Court judge, Oundo Clausina, said the Ministry of Defence, upon the compulsory acquisition of the 265 acres and 146 acres, should have undertaken an official sub-division to isolate them, which would have prevented the dispute.

“Had the Ministry of Defence, at the time of compulsory acquisition of the two parcels of land, undertaken an official survey to separate those portions from the particular LR number, we would not be where we are now,” said Wanyama.

He testified in a case where 210 members of Rumuruti Farmers Company Ltd have sued the Kenya Army.

.

Keep Reading business

•  New team to probe pension billions owed by counties Premium
•  KRA in fresh plan weed out graft at port
•  Why the IMF is not doing enough to support Africa Premium
•  Leveraging PPPs to address Kenya's infrastructure crisis
•  Skyward Express launches Nairobi to Dar es Salaam flight

The Registry Index Maps for the land, he said, were published in 1990 by the Director of Survey. He noted that the index maps resulted from the sub-division of various parcels of land.

During cross-examination, the Kenya Army asked the surveyor whether he was aware that the government had acquired 146 acres of land from LR No. 3777/146 and 265 acres from LR No. 9776 through compulsory acquisition, a matter to which he said he was not aware.

The Kenya Army informed the surveyor during the hearing that a caveat was placed on the land in 1977 when the government took possession, but the surveyor denied this. He argued that had the caveat been placed, the Registry Index Maps would not have been produced.

The military maintained that, to date, there is still a caveat on the two parcels of land.