From allies to adversaries: UhuRuto's betrayal politics

Machiavelli’s The Prince - a world famous book, has been a subject of protracted political controversy among political scientists and philosophers. 

Some consider it a straightforward revelation of political reality, while others view it as a manual teaching dishonest politicians and would-be tyrants how to seize and maintain power through crooked means.

American author Robert Greene’s The 48 Laws of Power is to a larger extent an extension of some of the guiding pointers drafted by Machiavelli which also offers unique insights into the nature of power- that it is dark and fluid and so those who play it can only win if they are ready to play it that way.

Kenya’s fourth President Uhuru Kenyatta and his then deputy William Ruto entered into a political alliance in the run-up to the 2013 elections.

.

Keep Reading business

•  Co-op Bank third-quarter profit jumps to Sh19b on higher income
•  I am not about to retire, Equity's James Mwangi says Premium
•  Report: Construction sector leads in mobile money use Premium
•  Delayed projects leave Kenya's blue economy limping Premium
•  Firms seek solutions in renewable energy to curb high cost of power

Pundits have argued that the two had been cut from different political cloths and would part ways anyway -perhaps based on interests. That was to happen after Uhuru made a surprise converging of interests with Odinga, his then rival during the 2017 elections in what has come to be known as handshake.

That sudden and quick event was the beginning of a rocky relationship within the holy Jubilee political marriage.

The showdown that led to a further split of the fragile alliance was the July 2019 arrest of the then-Treasury CS Henry Rotich on allegations of misappropriation of funds for building two dams in Elgeyo Marakwet at a cost of Sh21 billion.

Ruto took the bull by the horns when he declared that the arrest was politically instigated, a witch hunt, as no money had been lost in the funding of Arror and Kimwarer dams.

Whereas in an earlier political message to an Eldoret rally Uhuru had pledged to support his deputy to take the house on the hill after him “wasubiri yangu kumi ya Ruto kumi”  Kenyans were taken aback when he endorsed Raila in the lead up to the 2022 presidential elections.

Raila had been Uhuru’s bitter presidential rival in two previous elections.

Uhuru’s political actions, from the time he shelved his presidential ambitions while he was Chairman of Kanu to support Kibaki in 2007 to his fallout with Ruto. And abandoning Ruto in favour of Raila, give credence to the popular adage that there are no permanent friends or enemies in politics -only permanent interests.

Uhuru’s political actions further highlight the intrigues and machinations that underpin the country’s politics, which are the bane of political betrayals and dishonesty.

Former nominated Senator Harold Kipchumba says political betrayals in the country’s political landscape were driven by intense competition for political power, which provides the base for accumulating wealth and financial resources.

“The political betrayals are driven by selfish interests amongst political players who, in many instances, mobilise their communities to engage in political pacts to enable them to have bargaining power in distributing government resources,” Kipchumba says.

The political separations are also influenced by political orientations between those in power pacts.

Kipchumba says that the ICC phenomenon was the key driver that brought Uhuru and Ruto together.

“When the duo was acquitted of the charges, each started pulling in the opposite direction as they sought to satisfy their agenda and those of their hang-about who mainly bankrolled their campaign,” he says.

Former Mukurweini MP, Kabando wa Kabando, on his part, argues that political betrayals in the country were a “product of clash of interests between leaders who ascend to power with the intention of benefitting from public coffers.”

A culture of honesty and integrity has been lacking in the conduct of public affairs in the country, as the majority of those assuming state offices were interested in serving their selfish ends, adds Kabando.

“That is why the country is replete from numerous political betrayals right from the time we attained independence as leaders are not guided by any principles and desirable values, but greed for wealth and power,” he adds.

Veteran politician Njenga Mungai, in his analysis of political betrayals, says majority of leaders seeking political office perceived them as a “source of wealth and power.”

“Soon after independence, we established a culture where any person seeking to ascend to a political office must have money to bribe their way, and also mobilise their ethnic communities  to support their cause,” he says.

Mungai, chairperson of the Jubilee Party’s Council of Elders, adds that “political betrayals will continue to define our politics for years to come as most leaders are led by greed for power, wealth, and power.”