Why must we over-borrow, overspend, then tax Kenyans more?

This year’s Finance Bill looks set to be as controversial as the last. Several citizens, finance experts, and civic and business agencies are already sharing their views.

Sadly, the comprehensive analysis of the Okoa Uchumi Alliance, International Budget Partnership and others do not inspire hope.

Bizarrely, the introduction of 2.5 per cent taxes on motor vehicles will lead to vehicles worth Sh 4 million and above attracting less tax compared to cars bought at Sh 200,000. That is, unless the measure is to sweeten the deal for guzzlers bought by MPs with loans paid by taxpayers.

This measure has been roundly rejected with alternative proposals by the Kenya Private Sector Alliance, and financial and legal service agencies like KPMG, Deloitte and Bowmans.

Introducing VAT on ordinary bread and dairy products will raise the cost of living for most households. Mandatory eTIMS requirements and steep penalties will increase the cost of doing business for all hustlers.

Excise duty on telephone and internet data services will shrink the growing digital economy and widen the digital divide. Taxes on foreign exchange and money transfer services will discourage the 500,000-strong diaspora who currently contribute Sh667 billion in foreign exchange from remitting.

These measures, the 0.5 per cent tax increase on all imports, reintroducing taxes on plastic recycling machinery and eco-levies on digital devices that have a negative environmental impact seem to hang in the air without a clear public policy framework or incentives.

Even more worrying, the Bill proposes a blanket exemption for the Kenya Revenue Authority from the provisions of the Data Protection Act (2019). Should this go through, KRA and other authorities will be empowered without any safeguards, to access, assess and collect taxes as well as share our personal, business, and financial data in ways never seen before.

The proposal is classic “big brother” surveillance and shatters our constitutional right to privacy under Article 24. Only China has such a scheme.

Sadly, the pain of being “skinned alive” as some have described it, does not come with the promise of increased quality essential services, less corruption and more good governance.

The 2024/25 Budget of Sh3 trillion prioritises foreign creditors over Kenyan citizens, further defunds the 47 counties and proposes major cuts to the delivery of the Bill of Rights.

Students will have fewer school meals, women entrepreneurs less start-up capital, children with disabilities fewer funds for special needs education and pregnant mothers, fewer maternity services.

With the national government intrusively raiding housing and health functions constitutionally assigned to county governments, devolution seems set for another round of deliberate defunding.

Despite acute droughts and floods, it is perplexing that the agriculture and disaster management dockets seem set for 21 to 50 per cent budgetary cuts respectively.

If annually, Kenya loses Sh608 billion (7.8 per cent of GDP) to corruption and other human rights abuses, is it prudent to slash the budgets of the Auditor General, EACC, IPOA and the KNCHR among others?

The 2023/4 Finance Bill proposes to spend 23 per cent of our taxes on 42 foreign creditors and 55 per cent on 56 million Kenyans. If, as Article 203 (1) of the Constitution argues, the national interest should take precedence, can Kenyans not challenge this twelve-year-old model of over borrow, spend hard and then tax even harder? Alternatives exist.