Court rejects bid to stop Masinde Muliro University graduation
Western
By
Mary Imenza
| Dec 04, 2024
Kakamega Employment and Labour Relations Court has dismissed a case seeking to stop the Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology (MMUST) 21st graduation ceremony, set for December 11, 2024.
Johnson Simiyu Litiema had filed an urgent petition claiming the MMUST Vice-Chancellor was in office illegally and violating the Universities Act.
He also questioned the academic qualifications of the Council Chairperson, arguing they did not hold a recognised PhD.
However, Justice David Nderitu dismissed the application on Tuesday, noting Litiema was absent during the court session despite filing the case as urgent.
READ MORE
Debate on diaspora bond sparks mixed reactions among Kenyans
End of an era as Mastermind Tobacco to go under the hammer
Irony of lowest inflation in 17 years but Kenyans barely making ends meet
2024: Year of layoffs as businesses struggle to stay afloat
Honda and Nissan expected to begin merger talks
How new KRA guidelines will impact income tax calculation
Job loss fears as Mbadi orders cost-cutting in State agencies
Diversifying Kenya's exports for economic prosperity
“The petitioner filed the application under a certificate of urgency yet he has not appeared to argue the same,” Nderitu said.
The judge added that students were not part of the case, and halting the ceremony would be unfair to them.
“We have many innocent students, some coming from poor backgrounds... it will be unfair for a court to stop the ceremony,” he added.
Advocates for Dr. Pamela Sitienei, the second respondent, also urged the court to dismiss the case, pointing out that similar petitions had been filed before, especially during past graduations.
Litiema had claimed that unless the Vice-Chancellor’s appointment was confirmed and the Chairperson’s qualifications validated, the ceremony would cause irreparable harm to graduates.
He also sought a court order to compel MMUST to account for salaries and allowances paid to both officials since their appointments.
Earlier, the case had been referred from the High Court to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for further action.