Court lets MP Sudi off the hook in academic certificates forgery case
Politics
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Jun 08, 2024
Kapseret MP Oscar Sudi is a free man after the Anti-Corruption Court acquitted him of allegations of forging academic certificates.
Chief Magistrate Felix Kombo acquitted Sudi on all nine charges of forgery saying the evidence adduced in court was illegally and fraudulently obtained.
The Magistrate faulted the investigating agencies over how they obtained part of the evidence and that there was no evidence to support forgery charges.
The court heard that part of the evidence was obtained in a city hotel and at Sudi's former Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC) office which, the magistrate said, raised issues of credibility.
READ MORE
Behind-the-scenes rush as clock ticks for sale of Bamburi Cement
Pension industry seeks to flex its muscle in large State projects
Treasury goes for UAE loan as IMF cautions of debt situation
Traders claim closure of liquor stores, bars near schools punitive
Adani fallout is a lesson on accountability and transparency fight
Sustainable finance in focus for Kenyan banks as Co-op Bank feted
What forcing Google to sell Chrome could mean
How talent development is shaping Kenya's tech future
Street-style snappers reclaim the heart of Nairobi
Huawei, charity partners to empower women with digital skills in Kenya
Magistrate Kombo noted that when the investigators took evidence from Sudi from the hotel in Nairobi and KICC, no caution was given to him that he was recording a statement.
"There is no indication that the accused person was made aware of or represented by a counsel that he was recording a statement," he said.
He said the investigating officer did not record a cautionary statement and the two statements recorded from Sudi outside EACC offices were statements under inquiry.
"The State cannot therefore use the statement against Sudi in a trial. That would be possible if the accused was cautioned to maintain or retract the statement upon commencement of charges against him," he ruled.
Kombo also blamed the EACC investigators for trying to interrogate and record a statement from Sudi at a city hotel.
"The fact remains that the investigators purported to conduct official commission's duties in a hotel is illegal. The interrogation of a suspect at a venue of their choice is dubious," Kombo stated.
"When the venue is a hotel, in my view it would expose the work undertaken however legitimate since it would raise issues of impropriety, and credibility,” he ruled.
He added: “In the circumstances l agree with the defence submissions that the conduct of interrogation of Sudi and the recording of his statement at a city hotel was an irregular manner of conducting investigations and the evidence obtained thereof is suspicious."
The court also wondered why the State did not produce in court a statement made by Sudi at his former office at the KICC and failing to adduce a copy of diploma certificate and a copy of KCSE certificate.
On documents presented by Sudi at IEBC offices for clearance to vie for election, the magistrate noted: "The evidence presented in court shows that it is not the actual original documents presented by Sudi at IEBC offices," Kombo said.
Sudi had been accused of forging a diploma certificate in business Management and giving false information to an IEBC officer.