×
The Standard Group Plc is a multi-media organization with investments in media platforms spanning newspaper print operations, television, radio broadcasting, digital and online services. The Standard Group is recognized as a leading multi-media house in Kenya with a key influence in matters of national and international interest.
  • Standard Group Plc HQ Office,
  • The Standard Group Center,Mombasa Road.
  • P.O Box 30080-00100,Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Telephone number: 0203222111, 0719012111
  • Email: [email protected]

Thrill-driven or cash-strapped? Why couples seek open spaces for intimacy

 Local tourist at Kakamega forest on September 9, 2020. (Benjamin Sakwa/ Standard)

In recent years, public spaces, such as forests, parks, and other secluded outdoor areas have increasingly become hotspots for couples seeking intimacy. While the behaviour may seem unconventional, it is fueled by a mix of financial constraints, thrill-seeking tendencies, and a lack of awareness about the potential risks.

For many couples, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds, financial limitations are a significant factor. The cost of renting private spaces, such as hotel rooms or lodges can be prohibitive. A standard room might cost the upwards of Sh1,000, a sum many cannot afford. Instead, couples turn to forests, parks, or hidden outdoor corners, which are free and often easily accessible.

Thrill and excitement also play a role in this behaviour. Engaging in such acts in public spaces offers an adrenaline rush that some couples find irresistible. The combination of secrecy and risk creates a heightened sense of adventure that private spaces may not provide.

Moreover, limited privacy at home is another reason. In crowded households, where family members often share living spaces, couples might struggle to find alone time. Public spaces thus offer an alternative for some to escape prying eyes.

Dangers of outdoor intimacy

While the financial and emotional motivations may seem understandable, the risks associated with engaging in sexual activities in public spaces are substantial and multifaceted.

Legal consequences: Many jurisdictions consider public indecency a criminal offense. Couples caught in the act risk arrest, fines, or even jail time. In some cases, such behaviour can lead to long-term legal repercussions, including being registered as a sex offender in more stringent regions.

Health and hygiene risks: Forests and parks are far from sanitary environments for intimate activities. Couples expose themselves to insect bites, infections, and other health hazards. Used condoms, broken branches, and discarded items left by others in these locations create an unsanitary and unsafe environment.

Exposure to danger: Forests and parks often harbor physical dangers, including wild animals, hazardous terrain, and the potential for assault or robbery. For women in particular, the secluded nature of these areas makesthem vulnerable to predators or opportunistic criminals.

Impact on society and morals: Public intimacy erodes social norms and values. When such behaviour becomes rampant, it sets a poor example for children and other community members who might stumble upon these activities. It also sparks resentment among residents who feel their neighbourhoods and public spaces are being disrespected.

Addressing the Issue

Experts suggest that providing affordable and safe spaces for couples can help curb this behaviour.

Policies that encourage budget-friendly accommodations for young or low-income couples could be a solution. Public awareness campaigns highlighting the risks and legal implications of public intimacy can also deter individuals.

Moreover, increased policing of known hotspots and stricter penalties for offenders can serve as a deterrent. Community-driven initiatives, such as better utilisation of parks for family-friendly events, could help reclaim these spaces.

Related Topics


.

Popular this week