This comes after the Court of Appeal suspended orders directing IEBC to use a manual voter register as a backup for an electronic register.
Justices Fred Ochieng, Luka Kimaru, and Paul Gachoka said that United Democratic Alliance (UDA) had convinced them that it had a case against the verdict by Justice Thande Mugure requiring IEBC to use the Kenya Integrated Election Management System (KIEMs) alongside the manual register.
"Upon careful consideration of the issues in contention, we are of the considered opinion that the applicant has made a case for the grant of stay on the judgment of the High Court," the court ruled.
UDA's lawyer Elias Mutuma argued that there is a likelihood of a serious conflict and confusion on the mode of identification of voters on Election Day.
Mutuma argued that the integrity of the General Election is likely to be compromised by the possibility of misuse of the manual voter register since it lacks a safeguard for enhancing the credibility of elections.
Justice Mugure, in her judgment, found that the Wafula Chebukati-led commission would be violating voters' rights in the event voters are turned back because the kits cannot identify them.
"What happens to a registered voter whose details cannot be picked by the KIEMs kit for fault or failure of technology? If this decision remains unchallenged, there is no doubt that voters' constitutional rights to vote will be violated," said Justice Mugure.
She continued: "The first respondent has failed to make administrative arrangements for the conduct of election to facilitate and not deny an eligible citizen the right to vote as required by the Constitution."
The judge asserted that although IEBC had violated the constitution and its own internal memo on the use of both registers.
She noted that no electronic device is foolproof, impenetrable, or incorruptible.