Use of harsh laws against dissent will reverse hard-earned freedom

A water canon disperses protesters in the CBD during the protests on finance bill and the killing of Albert Ojwang on National budget day on 12th June 2025. [David Gichuru,Standard] This week, several people arrested during the June-July protests - including boda boda riders, fisherfolk, politicians, and security officers - were charged in Kenya's counterterrorism Kahawa Law Courts. The Supreme Council of Muslims (Supkem) also released its report on how the criminal justice system responds to religious extremism. While these two events may seem unrelated, Supkem's findings shed light on a worrying trend, the growing use of harsh legal measures to silence dissent. Forty-three of the youth charged in three separate cases of alleged terrorism were arraigned in Kahawa Law Courts on Wednesday. Among them are the Mawego 8, the suspects arrested for the arson attack on Mawego Police Station in Homa Bay during the funeral of Albert Ojwang'. The 8 young Kenyan boda boda riders and fishermen denied these charges and were released on a cash bail of Sh50,000. The amount being too high for them or their families to raise, their lawyers have filed for revision while they wait in detention. One day later, former army and police officers Patrick Osoi and Jackson "@CopShakur" Kuria were charged with preparing to commit a felony and possessing a firearm. The two are self-proclaimed members of the Fighting Brutality and Impunity (FBI) lobby group and have been actively condemning extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and police brutality on social media platforms for several weeks. Jackson Kuria was arrested while attending Osoi's hearing within the court compound. They two have been detained until Principal Magistrate Richard Koech makes a ruling on their bail application next week. Terrorism charges and applications for pre-trial detention for up to 14 days is a clear strategy the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) is following in the cases. Over the month of August, the cases will be heard and eventually lead to acquittals or convictions. Released this week, the new Supkem report on how Kenya's justice system handles religious extremism is timely and revealing. Around the world, countries like India and France are using citizenship laws to target Muslims or control Islamic practices more strictly. Kenya has a similar history. During colonial times, communities like the Nubians, coastal Arabs, and Somali Muslims faced discrimination and were often denied citizenship. Even after independence, many Muslims living on our northern and eastern borders have been treated as second-class citizens in a country where Christianity is dominant. Interviewing 500 men and women, the study found that while poverty and lack of formal education pushes people toward violent extremism, they are not the main reasons. Surprisingly, religion, money, or ethnicity are not the strongest drivers either. The biggest reason people turn to violence is because they feel mistreated by the government, police and security forces. When people lose trust and feel angry about perceived injustice, they are more likely to join violent groups and hurt others. The study details the circumstances leading up to the extra-judicial killing of 23 victims in 2020. The men came from Mombasa, Kwale, Lamu, Kilifi, Makueni and Nairobi counties. While the specific details differ, the pattern of unidentified men mounting surveillance, raiding homes, mosques or residential neighborhoods, extracting their victim before killing and dumping their bodies, is similar. The report argues that these actions were made possible by the infamous Security Laws (Amendment) Act (2014) which gave sweeping powers to the National Intelligence Service and counterterrorism agencies. Under the amendments, NIS officers can search, seize and detain suspects, undertake any covert operation or neutralise any threat, the Director General feels is necessary to preserve national security. The amendments also amended the Prevention of Terrorism Act by inserting clauses that criminalise those who advocate, glorify or facilitate a terrorist act, extended detention to 360 days and removed several safeguards critical for a fair trial under our Constitution. Although the Supkem study focuses on Islam and Muslims, it's main finding that current laws are harsh and prone to abuse may also apply to those arrested during the June-July protests.

Use of harsh laws against dissent will reverse hard-earned freedom

Get Full Access for Ksh299/Week.

Related Topics

Similar Articles

Latest Stories

The Standard Insider

Digger Classified

GET OUR NEWSLETTER

CONNECT WITH US

FOR THE LATEST JOB ADVERTS

Similar Articles

Informal livestock trade continues to hurt Africa's pastoral economies

Why property buyers are seeking higher grounds

Inside Watamu's developments spurring beach tourism

KCB unveils record Sh22 billion dividend payout as profit surges

DIGGER JOBS

Digger Motors

Digger Real Estate

Use of harsh laws against dissent will reverse hard-earned freedom

Get Full Access for Ksh299/Week.

Related Topics

Similar Articles

Latest Stories

The Standard Insider

Digger Classified

GET OUR NEWSLETTER

CONNECT WITH US

FOR THE LATEST JOB ADVERTS