City Hall may have lost Sh250m in land payment
Nairobi
By
Pkemoi Ng'enoh
| May 18, 2024
Nairobi City County could have lost Sh250 million in irregular payment for a piece of land located in Industrial Area.
The payment was carried out in the 2019/2020 financial year, according to investigations by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.
The findings are part of the EACC quarterly report (January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024) published in the Kenya Gazette on May 17, 2024.
The report states that in 1993, a local company acquired the farm legally and it has developed with time, with crucial utilities including schools and health centres.
However, the commission’s probe established that in 2014, the company filed a civil suit seeking orders for compensation and vacation of the land by the Nairobi City County Government.
READ MORE
How new KRA guidelines will impact income tax calculation
Job loss fears as Mbadi orders cost-cutting in State agencies
Diversifying Kenya's exports for economic prosperity
State defends livestock vaccination programme
Amazon says US strike caused 'no disruptions'
State warns millers against wheat imports
Tanzania firm now eyes other sectors after Bamburi acquisition
HF Group raises Sh6.4b from the rights issue
The company wanted the County out since public utilities were developed on the land by the county. EACC stated that their probe established the County had entered into a consent with the company that owned the land.
“The consent was adopted by the court and a decree was thereafter issued. One of the conditions of the decree was that the company was to be paid Sh250 million,” the report states.
EACC established that on July 17, 2020, the County paid the company the money.
“The payment was irregular since the title of the land in question had been charged to a bank for a sum of Sh1.6 billion. This meant that the company was paid yet the land was charged,” EACC reported.
EACC stated that on February 13, 2024, a report was compiled and forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions with the recommendation to charge some individuals. They include the director of the company, county attorney, and director of legal affairs.