Blow to government as new health scheme declared unconstitutional
Health & Science
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Jul 12, 2024
President William Ruto's new healthcare plan faces a major hurdle after the High Court declared the Social Health Insurance Act unconstitutional.
In a judgment rendered by a three-judge bench comprising Justices Alfred Mabeya, Robert Limo, and Friday Mugambi on Friday, July 12, the Court found that the Social Health Insurance Act violates several provisions of the Constitution concerning healthcare.
"We find that sections 26 (5), 2791) (a), 27 (4), and 47 (3) of the Act are null and void and therefore unconstitutional," the judges stated.
In their decision, the judges found that the health program had burdened a few salaried individuals, thus creating a disparity in the contribution.
READ MORE
Kenya targets North African startups in regional innovation push
French firms target Kenya housing sector after Africa summit
Lamu rising digital economy through youth skills training
Construction sector adjusts to clinker levy on industry rebound
Security concerns evolve as Kenya embraces technology, urban expansion
Inside Sh104b Mombasa port expansion plan
Kenya's coastal land market surges on lifestyle, remote work demand
Kenya eyes green finance to boost climate-smart construction
Westgate Mall bets on improved security, new activities to up foot traffic
The court also held that some sections of the Act are unconditional as they purport to usurp the roles of the county governments in the provision of health services to citizens.
Consequently, the judges gave Parliament 120 days to make amends to the said Act.
The court said Parliament should undertake adequate public participation per the Constitution before enacting the same Act and amending the unconstitutional provisions.
The decision comes after Joseph Enock Aura filed a petition at the High Court seeking to quash the SHI Act 2023, Primary Health Care Act, 2023, and Digital Health Act, 2023, which replaced the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), arguing that it is unconstitutional.