As elections draw near, Kenyan media is awash with analysts eager to give varied interpretations of the political situation in Kenya. Currently, politicians are posturing as political analysts and consequently failing the purpose. This is so because the approaches of politicians are distinctly different from those of political analysts.
The politician is clearly hellbent on crafting a praise song for one party and find fault with the non-conforming party. Whereas a politician is willing to shout and muffle his perceived opponent’s contribution, a true analyst waits for his or her time.
The politician will try to outshine his or her perceived opponent to impress specific viewers. He speaks with unbridled arrogance and does not want to be interrupted. On the other hand, a political analyst poses as though to ask if the point is clear and anticipates an inquiry so that the discourse is complete.
The second flaw of a politician vis-a-vis an analyst is the fallacy of trying to impress. On this account, the analyst interrogates what actions mean to the presumed masses and how the very masses interpret the actions. He then furthers this thought to tell us why they still have choices.
The politician attacks personalities with the book of damnation, citing scandals at home, in school, a previous work station, slurs and so on, hoping the script will change some ballot pattern. The politician will be armed with sections of the constitution, policies, and guidelines to embolden his or her position. The analyst on the other hand explains how those provisions influence decisions and choices in the political arena.
READ MORE
How power play in counties kills what devolved system promises
Livestock vaccination to open global market: Ruto
Political analysis presupposes an emotionally removed yet intellectually engaging method. He pretends not to be having a stake in the argument. So he pinches himself when he is about to scream his point since it can be misconstrued as politically gifting rather than scrutiny.
Finally, another impressive mark of a good analysts is concession- acknowledging strength in another position that is averse to yours. The guest who wants to thrive in the middle of the audience as an analyst must contend with that safety valve or forfeit the title of political analyst. Peter Onyancha, Programme Manager Specialist and a Social Commentator