On September 9,
Devolution CS Mwangi Kiunjuri signed and forwarded a gazette notice to the
Office of the Attorney General to publish the commencement of the Public
Benefit Organizations Act of 2013.
For starters, the Act is
the new law providing for the establishment and regulation of Public Benefit
Organizations (PBOs), commonly known as NGOs. The law will repeal the NGO
co-ordination Act of 1990.
The law is not new as
the anticipated gazettement of its commencement seems to imply. The Act was
passed by Parliament in 2012 and assented to by retired President Mwai Kibaki
in January 2013.
The passage of the law
followed consultations dating back to 2009. This is when a group of civil
society actors, under the aegis of “committee of the wise”, came together to
reflect on the role the civil society had played in the social, economic and
political development in Kenya.
The Cabinet, under the
Grand Coalition Government, had adopted Sessional Paper No.1 of 2006 on NGOs as
its policy framework for the sector. The Paper was a culmination of
consultations that started in December 2001, when the NGOs Co-ordination Board
decided to involve stakeholders in developing a law that would reflect
Government plan in enhancing delivery of quality services by the NGOs. It would
also redefine the relationship between the government and the sector from one characterized
by suspicion and antagonism to one of respectful partnership and collaboration.
READ MORE
Walkouts, weak deals and COP29 failures
Unending strikes, crash programs breeding unbaked graduates
Indeed, the then
Heritage minister Suleiman Shakombo aptly captured the mood of the moment in
the Forward to the Policy Paper saying: “The aims and aspirations expressed in
this paper will however remain a distant dream if the identified policies and
strategies are not put in practice and strategies put in practice by both the
regulator and the sector players”.
But implementation of
the PBO Act has been stymied for the last three years. The process has been
dogged by controversies as the government made spirited attempts to amend it
even before its operational challenges are appreciated and appropriate remedies
proposed.
The sector is, however,
relieved that after the long procrastination and prevarication, wisdom finally
prevailed, with the CS pointing out that “after gathering information about the
controversies surrounding the new law, the Government decided to operationalize
the law as it balances Government regulation with self-regulation”.
The new law brings about
a paradigm shift in the manner in which the new regulator, to be known as the
Public Benefit Organizations Regulatory Authority will be constituted, run and
conduct its affairs.
Unlike in under the old
law, the Authority will now have 60 days, after receiving an application, to
consider it and if it meets the requirements, register an NGO. This is one area
where those seeking to register organizations have greatly been aggrieved. The
regulator, acting in cahoots with individuals and groups with vested interests,
kept applicants waiting until they gave up.
NGOs have been defined
by what they are not as opposed to what they actually are. Drafters of the PBO
Act realized not every outfit that is non-governmental defines what the
voluntary sector does. For example, there are private businesses, trade unions,
political parties, societies within the meaning of the Societies Act,
co-operatives, Saccos and micro-finance institutions that are not necessarily
governmental but which champion the cause of their members only and not the
general public.
Thus, for the first
time, there is a law that will separate the not-for-profit sector with the
profit making non-governmental organisations. The work of PBOs is voluntary and
benefits the general public.