The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) has a monumental task of restoring waning public confidence in its work.
The anti-graft body is a pale shadow of its equivalent in developed countries. Lately, it has been involved in investigations leading to pre-mature termination of cases.
Many Kenyans are wondering what should be done to rejuvenate the anti-graft body.
First, EACC has a poor record of giving feedback to the public. Cases turn into a-wait-and-wait game. Everything goes mum. This silence breeds suspicion and doubts.
Second, the frequent termination of graft cases involving high-ranking Government officers is a blow to its mandate. Only small people are convicted.
READ MORE
Omtatah in court to stop new EACC boss from taking office in January
Anti-graft agency can't extricate itself from ODPP's grip easily
Only truly independent agencies can we win war against graft
Third, EACC is involved in selective application of the law during investigations. Some of the officers implicated in malpractices are forced to step aside while others remain in office. Why the double standards?
Lastly, EACC is obliged to act above board. Unsatisfactory performance cannot be tolerated. Kenyans are yearning for an effective anti-graft agency. As things stand, EACC is yet to impress the public.
